Teknik Pembuatan Pledoi dan Memori Banding di Rumah Tahanan Negara Kelas I Surakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71365/ejpm.v2i2.72Keywords:
Pledoi, Memory, Appeal, Detention CenterAbstract
A plea is a form of defense carried out by the defendant and his legal advisor containing responses relating to the demands or accusations of the public prosecutor, as well as matters that can mitigate the sentence and truths that support the defendant. This is regulated in Article 182, paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. A plea, also known as a defense, is made in writing and read out during the trial. The purpose of the defendant in filing a plea is as a request to be granted a verdict of acquittal from all legal charges or to ask for leniency in sentence. Apart from the plea, after the case is decided, the defendant still has the right to take legal action in order to achieve justice, namely an appeal. The appeal is carried out with the aim of re-examining the case that has been decided by the judge at the first-level court, whether it is in accordance with the rules or whether there are irregularities in the first-level decision. This community service activity helps defendants to provide an understanding of the rights that defendants are entitled to in criminal justice through pleadings and legal appeals. This activity takes the form of legal empowerment, where defendants in the Surakarta Class I Detention Center are taught how to prepare pleadings and appeal memorandums properly and correctly in order to achieve the fairest possible justice and to better understand the demands of the public prosecutor and the first-level judge's decision.
References
Basri, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.90
Gusmawati, I. (2021). Makalah “ banding .” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Ekasakti A.
Handayani, Z. (2022). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Tingkat Banding terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika yang Berbeda terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kotabumi. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 3138–3147. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=3034846%5C&val=20674%5C&title=Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Tingkat Banding terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika yang Berbeda terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kotabumi
Helmi, M. (2021). Pembelaan (Pledoi) Advokat berdasar Paradigma Critical Theory Guba And Lincoln. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 16(1), 45–54. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pandecta/article/view/26457
INDONESIA, U.-U. R. (1981). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (p. 108).
Mardhatillah, U., & Ratnawati Gultom, E. (2023). Upaya Hukum Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Menjatuhkan Amar Diluar Surat Dakwaan (Analisis Terhadap Putusan Nomor 187/Pid.B/2018/Pn Mam). UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 6(4), 462. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.287
Pambudi, R., Sari, W. P., Kurnianingsih, M., Pamuncak, A. W., Prakoso, A. L., & Iksan, M. (2021). Sosialisasi Bantuan Hukum dan Pelatihan Pembuatan Pledoi Sebagai Pemenuhan Hak Terdakwa di Rumah Tahanan Boyolali. Masyarakat Berdaya Dan Inovasi, 2(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.33292/mayadani.v2i1.58
Putra, Daniel Banjarnahor, Yetti, T. A. (2024). Upaya Hukum Jaksa Penuntut Umum Kejaksaan Negeri Siak Terhadap Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Siak Sri Indrapura Berdasarkan Undang – Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Daniel Banjarnahor Yetti Tri Anggara Putra PE. SEMNASHUM, 1–12.
Rizqi, K. P. M. (2021). Upaya Hukum yang Dapat Dimohonkan Terhadap Putusan Perkara Pidana yang Ne Bis In Idem. Jurist-Diction, 4(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i1.24298
Salim Fauzi Lubis, R. H. S. (2023). Implementasi Hak-Hak Narapidana Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas Ii B TanjungbalaI. EX-Officio Law Review, 2(3), 223–230.
Sanovan, B. F. Y. (2023). Materi PKPA: Seluk Beluk Pledoi dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. HeyLaw. https://heylaw.id/blog/seluk-beluk-pledoi
